Environmental Conservation News - 2007
Since Eco-Photo Explorers (EPE) was formed to help promote public interest in protecting the underwater environment through knowledge and awareness, this section will be used to provide information on special environmental conservation efforts that you should know about.
This web page contains links to other Internet sites and should not be considered endorsements of any products or services. No information in these sites have been endorsed or approved by Eco-Photo Explorers.
Study: Glaciers contributing more to rising seas
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Don't worry too much, for now, about
rising seas caused by melting ice in Greenland and Antarctica.
The big threat this century could come from small thawing
glaciers, researchers reported Thursday.
Even though these glaciers contain only 1 percent of the water
tied up in the great ice sheets of Antarctica and Greenland,
they could account for 60 percent of an anticipated rise in the
world's sea level by the year 2100.
Sea-level rise is seen as a key consequence of global warming,
and much of the concern has focused on the big ice sheets that
contain the vast majority of the world's ice.
Researchers writing in the online journal Science Express
estimate melting glaciers, which are located all over the globe
including in the tropics, could add between 4 and 10 inches to
world sea level this century.
While this may not sound like much, consider that some 100
million people live within 3.3 vertical feet of sea level, said
Mark Meier of the University of Colorado-Boulder, a lead author
of the study.
"If we had almost a foot (of sea-level rise) just due to the
small glaciers, add that to the amount due to the ice sheets,
which could be appreciable by 2100, and add to that the ocean
warming which will cause it to expand in volume, then we get a
rise that we can't ignore," Meier said in a telephone interview.
Even a tiny amount of sea-level rise can make a vast inland
incursion of water in flat coastal areas, as much or more than
100 times the distance inland as the height of the rise, he
said.
Meier said the huge amounts of ice locked in Greenland and
Antarctica hold the potential for "some really horrendous sea
level rise" -- as much as 3.3 feet -- if they ever completely
melt.
That is unlikely to happen this century, although Greenland's
ice sheet currently contributes 28 percent and Antarctica's
contributes 12 percent to the total ice-melt that fuels
sea-level rise, the researchers found.
"Now don't ask me about 1,000 years from now," Meier said. "But
for the next few generations we think that we should not ignore
the little glaciers."
There are hundreds of thousands of small glaciers all over the
world, including in tropical New Guinea, but the important ones
in terms of global sea-level change are in Alaska, Canada,
Russia and Scandinavia, Meier said.
Part of the reason glaciers are contributing more to rising seas
is because of rapid changes in how they flow, co-author Robert
Anderson said in a statement.
Many glaciers are getting thinner and that makes them slide more
quickly toward the sea.
"While this is a dynamic, complex process and does not seem to
be a direct result of climate warming, it is likely that climate
acts as a trigger to set off this dramatic response," said
Anderson, also of the University of Colorado-Boulder.
The sea ice that seasonally covers the Arctic Ocean would
contribute nothing to sea-level rise, much as a melting ice cube
in a glass of water would not make the glass overflow. Rising
seas are caused by water from ice that has been locked up on
land.
Source: CNN, POSTED: updated 3:00 p.m. EDT, Thu July 19, 2007
Report: Global warming threatens cultural landmarks
NEW YORK (AP) -- Rising seas, spreading deserts, intensifying
weather and other harbingers of climate change are threatening
cultural landmarks from Canada to Antarctica, the World Monuments
Fund said Wednesday.
New Orleans' hurricane-ravaged historic neighborhoods, the
Church of the Holy Nativity under Palestinian control in Bethlehem,
cultural heritage sites in Iraq and Machu Picchu Historic Sanctuary
in Peru are among the locations listed on the fund's top 100 most
endangered.
The U.S. locations also include historic Route 66, the fabled
east-west highway flanked by eccentric, deteriorating attractions,
and the New York State Pavilion, a rusting remnant of the 1964
World's Fair in New York City's Queens borough.
"On this list, man is indeed the real enemy," Bonnie Burnham,
president of the New York-based fund, said in a statement. "But,
just as we caused the damage in the first place, we have the power
to repair it."
This year's list of the 100 most endangered sites includes 59
countries. The United States is home to more listed sites than any
other country at seven, including types of development such as "Main
Street Modern" public buildings that symbolized progress after World
War II. There are six sites listed in Peru and five each in India
and Turkey.
This year's list is the first to add global warming to a roster
of forces the organization says are threatening humanity's
architectural and cultural heritage. Other factors include political
conflict, pollution, development and tourism pressures, and a thirst
for modernity in buildings and lifestyles.
The list is issued every two years. It is intended as a cultural
clarion call, and the organization suggests it has been a successful
one.
More than three-quarters of the places listed in previous years
are no longer imperiled, according to the organization, which has
given more than $47 million to help save about 200 sites since 1996.
A group of experts chose the sites from hundreds of nominations
submitted by governments, conservationists and others. The
selections were based on the sites' importance and the urgency of
the dangers to them, the organization said.
On Herschel Island, Canada, melting permafrost threatens ancient
Inuit sites and a historic whaling town. In Chinguetti, Mauritania,
the desert is encroaching on an ancient mosque. In Antarctica, a hut
once used by British explorer Captain Robert Falcon Scott has
survived almost a century of freezing conditions but is now in
danger of being engulfed by increasingly heavy snows.
Other sites face different perils. Political conflicts are
clouding the future of all Iraq's cultural heritage sites and the
remains of two ancient, giant Buddha statues in Afghanistan's
province of Bamiyan, in the fund's view. The statues were destroyed
by the Taliban in 2001, but there have been some efforts to restore
them.
Growth pressures are being felt in places such as Ireland's Hill
of Tara, an earthen fort where Celtic chieftains jockeyed for power
and legend says St. Patrick confronted paganism. A planned highway,
intended to ease commuting between Dublin and a northwestern suburb,
would pass near the hill.
Other places, such as Peru's famed Machu Picchu, are considered
threatened by their own popularity. A new bridge recently opened to
cater to backpackers headed to Machu Picchu, although government
cultural experts said it could bring too many tourists to the
delicate Inca ruins.
Source: CNN, POSTED: 2:42 p.m. EDT, June 6, 2007
Related Information
Thunder? It's the sound of Greenland melting
ILULISSAT, Greenland (Reuters) -- Atop Greenland's Suicide Cliff,
from where old Inuit women used to hurl themselves when they felt
they had become a burden to their community, a crack and a thud like
thunder pierce the air.
"We don't have thunder here. But I know it from movies," says
Ilulissat nurse Vilhelmina Nathanielsen, who hiked with us through
the melting snow. "It's the ice cracking inside the icebergs. If
we're lucky we might see one break apart."
It's too early in the year to see icebergs crumple regularly but the
sound is a reminder. As politicians squabble over how to act on
climate change, Greenland's ice cap is melting, and faster than
scientists had thought possible.
A new island in East Greenland is a clear sign of how the place is
changing. It was dubbed Warming Island by American explorer Dennis
Schmitt when he discovered in 2005 that it had emerged from under
the retreating ice.
If the ice cap melted entirely, oceans would rise by 23 feet,
flooding New York and London, and drowning island nations like the
Maldives.
A total meltdown would take centuries but global warming, which
climate experts blame mainly on human use of fossil fuels, is
heating the Arctic faster than anywhere else on Earth.
"When I was a child, I remember hunters dog-sledding 50 miles on ice
across the bay to Disko Island in the winter," said Judithe
Therkildsen, a retiree from Aasiaat, a town south of Ilulissat on
Disko Bay.
"That hasn't happened in a long time."
Greenland, the world's largest island, is mostly covered by an ice
cap of about 624,000 cubic miles that accounts for a 10th of all the
fresh water in the world.
Over the last 30 years, its melt zone has expanded by 30 percent.
"Some people are scared to discover the process is running faster
than the models," said Konrad Steffen, a glaciologist at University
of Colorado at Boulder and a Greenland expert who serves on a U.S.
government advisory committee on abrupt climate change.
In the past 15 years, winter temperatures have risen about 9 degrees
Fahrenheit on the cap, while spring and autumn temperatures
increased about 5 degrees Fahrenheit. Summer temperatures are
unchanged.
Swiss-born Steffen is one of dozens of scientists who have peppered
the Greenland ice cap with instruments to measure temperature,
snowfall and the movement, thickness and melting of the ice.
Since 1990, Steffen has spent two months a year at Swiss Camp, a
wind-swept outpost of tents on the ice cap, where he and other
researchers brave temperatures of minus 22 degrees Fahrenheit to
scrutinize Greenland's climate change clues.
The more the surface melts, the faster the ice sheet moves towards
the ocean. The glacier Swiss Camp rests on has doubled its speed to
about 9 miles a year in the last 12 years, just as its tongue
retreated 10 km into the fjord.
"It is scary," said Steffen. "This is only Greenland. But Antarctica
and glaciers around the world are responding as well."
Two to three days' worth of icebergs from this glacier alone produce
enough fresh water to supply New York City for a year.
The rush of new water leaves scientists with crucial questions about
how much sea levels could rise and whether the system of ocean
currents that ensures Western Europe's mild winters -- known as the
"conveyor belt" -- could shut down.
"Some models can predict a change in the conveyor belt within 50 to
100 years," said Steffen. "But it's one out of 10 models. The
uncertainty is quite large."
If you're a fisherman in Greenland, however, global warming is doing
wonders for your business.
Warmer waters entice seawolf and cod to swim farther north in the
Atlantic into Greenlandic nets. In this Disko Bay town, the world's
iceberg capital, the harbor is now open year-round because winter is
no longer cold enough to freeze it solid.
Warmer weather also boosts tourism, a source of big development
hopes for the 56,000 mostly Inuit inhabitants of Greenland, which is
a self-governing territory of Denmark.
Hoping to lure American visitors, Air Greenland launched a direct
flight from Baltimore last month, and there is even talk of "global
warming tourism" to see Warming Island.
One commentator, noting the carbon dioxide emissions such travel
would create, has called that "eco-suicide tourism."
Source: CNN, POSTED: 10:44 a.m. EDT, June 6, 2007
U.N.: Melting ice, snow to hit livelihoods worldwide
OSLO, Norway (Reuters) -- Global warming that is melting ice and
snow will affect hundreds of millions of people around the globe by
disrupting rivers in Asia, thawing Arctic ice and raising ocean
levels, a U.N. report said on Monday.
Glaciers from the Himalayas to the Alps are in retreat, permafrost
from Alaska to Siberia is warming and snowfalls are becoming
unreliable in many regions, according to a "Global Outlook for Ice
and Snow" written by more than 70 experts.
And it said the changes, widely blamed on greenhouse gases released
by mankind's use of fossil fuels, would be felt far from polar
regions or high mountain areas.
"Fate of the world's snowy and icy places as a result of climate
change should be cause for concern in every ministry, boardroom and
living room across the world," said Achim Steiner, head of U.N.
Environment Programme of the 238-page report.
He said the findings were relevant "from Berlin to Brasilia, and
Beijing to Boston".
The report said that about 40 percent of the world's 6.5 billion
population would be affected by retreating glaciers in Asia -- snow
and ice in the Himalayas, for instance, help regulate river flows
and irrigation from China to India.
And a one meter (3 ft 3 in) rise in world sea levels, linked to
expansion of the oceans as they warm and melt from glaciers, could
cause almost $950 billion in damage and expose 145 million people to
flooding, it said.
Oceans rose by almost 20 centimeters last century and U.N. studies
project a further rise of 18-59 centimeters by 2100. Asia would be
hard hit by rising seas, especially low-lying Bangladesh, it said.
Environment Day
The snow and ice report was released on the eve of World
Environment Day, and two days before a June 6-8 summit by the
leaders of the world's top eight industrial powers in Germany.
"The world cannot afford simply to discuss climate change. It has to
act," Steiner said.
The report said there were big uncertainties about the fate of ice
on Greenland and Antarctica, the world's main stores of fresh water.
Greenland contains enough ice to raise sea levels by 7 meters;
bigger Antarctica by about 60 meters.
And less snow is falling in many areas, with a 1.3 percent decline
per decade since the 1960s in the northern hemisphere.
A one degree Celsius (1.8 Fahrenheit) temperature rise would raise
the snow line in the Alps by 150 meters, for instance, damaging ski
resorts and tourism.
And lifestyles were already changing. Hunters in Qeqertarsuaq in
western Greenland were turning to use motorboats rather than
dogsleds because the sea ice was no longer solid. Polar bears are
among animals under threat from shrinking ice.
The report said the rise in temperatures "has not yet resulted in
widespread permafrost thawing." Even so, the report said the
quantity of methane being released from permafrost in Siberia may
already be five times more than previously supposed. Methane is a
powerful greenhouse gas stored in vast quantities in permafrost.
Among benefits from melting ice, a northern sea route along the
coast of Russia could be open for 120 days a year by 2100 against 30
now.
And the report pointed to dangers of abrupt floods linked to a
melting of glaciers that have blocked lakes. In 1998 a so-called
glacier lake outburst flood killed more than 100 people in
Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan.
Source: CNN, POSTED: 5:07 a.m. EDT, June 4, 2007
Japan threatens to quit whaling forum
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) -- Japan threatened to quit the
International Whaling Commission Thursday after fierce opposition
from anti-whaling nations forced it to scrap a proposal to allow
four coastal villages to hunt the animals.
Japan had argued its proposal to catch minke whales should fall
under the umbrella of community whaling because whaling has been
part of its culture for thousands of years.
It did not call for a formal vote on the proposal when it became
apparent it lacked the votes to get the measure passed.
The 77-member IWC voted earlier in the week to allow aboriginal
whaling for indigenous people in the United States, Russia and
Greenland. Japan endorsed those whaling quotas and had asked for the
same consideration. (Full story)
"This hypocrisy leads us to seriously question the nature by
which Japan will continue participating in this forum," said Joji
Morishita, the deputy whaling commissioner.
Opponents said Japan's proposal was a tacit request for
permission to resume commercial whaling, 21 years after the IWC put
a moratorium on the practice. Environmentalists credit the ban for
saving the Earth's largest creatures from extinction.
Australian Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull said passing
the coastal whaling proposal would have set a precedent that could
not be undone.
"The minute you open the door to commercial whaling, how do you
shut it again? That is the problem," said Turnbull.
It was not the first time Japan has threatened to leave the
organization.
"The only thing more familiar than their empty threat to leave
the IWC is their disregard for decisions they don't like," said
Patrick Ramage, head of the International Fund for Animal Welfare's
global whale campaign.
Japan had postponed the vote on its proposal Wednesday to allow
more time for negotiation with anti-whaling nations, but the two
sides failed to bridge their ideological divide.
Morishita suggested earlier in the week Japan was willing to
give ground on a controversial plan to start hunting 50 humpback
whales next year under its scientific whaling program in exchange
for support for its coastal whaling proposal.
Japan -- which leads the pro-whaling bloc and has gathered
support from African, Caribbean and some Asian nations -- is allowed
to take more than 1,000 whales per year for scientific research.
Critics say most of the meat ends up in supermarkets and restaurants
and that Japan rarely publishes its findings.
Australia and its anti-whaling allies rejected a deal, saying
Japan was attempting to hold humpback whales "hostage."
Humpback whales are noted for the complex songs sung by males
and for their acrobatic behavior, making them popular with
whale-watching tourists.
Their numbers have recovered somewhat and are estimated at
between 30,000 and 60,000. This is still only about a third of
pre-whaling levels and the species continues to be classified as
vulnerable.
As a last-ditch effort, Japan offered a separate resolution
asking the IWC's scientific committee for a method to calculate
sustainable catch limits for its coastal villages so that the IWC
could review quotas for Japan's coastal villages in 2008.
Japan requested its resolution be passed by consensus vote but
decided against raising it for a formal vote after New Zealand and
others expressed opposition.
Japan's threat to leave the IWC brought an end to a meeting that
was, at times, both testy and conciliatory.
Humpback whales protected
Earlier Thursday, the IWC passed a proposal to let Greenland
expand indigenous whale hunting after the Danish territory broke a
deadlock by agreeing not to start catching humpback whales.
Greenland's representatives postponed the vote to negotiate and
eventually agreed to give up a proposed new hunt quota of 10
humpback whales.
The proposal, first made by Denmark Tuesday, increases western
Greenland's minke whale catch limits by 25 a year to 200 in the
five-year period ending in 2012 and introduces two bowhead whales
into its annual hunt.
Greenland said the catch limits allowed by the IWC over the last
20 years did not meet the dietary needs of its people.
Anti-whaling nations had said there was not enough evidence to
accept that a rise in catch limits would be sustainable.
Atlantic minke whale numbers have been estimated at around
180,000, with another 700,000 around Antarctica.
Source: CNN, POSTED: 10:45 p.m. EDT, May 31, 2007
Related Information
Anti-whaling nations oppose Japan
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) -- Anti-whaling nations said on Monday they
oppose Japan's proposal to permit whale hunting in its coastal communities
and will push for Japanese concessions on other issues.
On the first day of the International Whaling Commission's annual meeting,
the United States and its anti-whaling allies said they see Japan's proposal
as a way to resume commercial whaling through the backdoor.
"Japan's proposal for coastal whaling is, in effect, a partial resumption of
commercial whaling," said Malcolm Turnbull, Australia's environment
minister, at a news conference.
The group of allies, which included Australia, New Zealand, Britain, Brazil,
Argentina and Germany, said they will not engage in "horse trading," even if
Japan compromised on its controversial plan to hunt 50 humpback whales next
year as part of its scientific-research program.
Japan, which has obeyed a 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling but uses a
loophole to hunt whales for scientific research, has argued that it sees no
difference between commercial whaling and noncommercial whaling by
aboriginal groups.
Japan said it would introduce a proposal this week that would allow four
coastal communities to catch a small number of minke whales under a hunting
exemption used by aboriginal communities.
Japan also said its proposal would not result in a net increase of minke
whales caught, because, if passed, it would reduce the number of minke
whales caught under its scientific-research program.
Aboriginal quotas
Joji Morishita, Japan's deputy whaling commissioner, said his country is
open to dialogue on all issues, including its plan to add humpback whales to
its annual Antarctic hunt, which currently takes minke and fin whales.
Ministers from Australia and New Zealand asked Japan to call off the plans
to hunt humpback whales as a sign of goodwill, but said it would not use the
coastal-whaling issue as a bargaining chip.
"We know that there are very strong emotions, especially in Australia and
New Zealand, about this particular species," Morishita said. "Hopefully we
can have mutual acceptance of difference."
Japan is expected to offer its proposal on Tuesday when the commission
debates the renewal of five-year aboriginal whaling quotas.
Alaska Natives, who use whale meat as a staple in their diet and for
cultural practices, are counting on this international permit that allows
them to hunt in the tradition of their ancestors and share meat among fellow
villagers.
The U.S. delegation said its top priority will be to obtain a renewed quota
that allows Alaska Natives to kill 41 bowhead whales a year.
"It is more than a right. It is an absolute necessity," Sen. Ted Stevens, an
Alaska Republican, said in an address to the commission.
Japan's Morishita said it will back renewed quotas for Alaska Natives and
will not link its own coastal community proposal with that issue.
Also up for renewal are aboriginal quotas for natives in the Russian Far
East, Greenland and other small indigenous communities.
Source: CNN, POSTED: 12:32 a.m. EDT, May 29, 2007
Related Information
- International Whaling Commission | Other stories
- International Whaling Commission's Annual Meeting
- Anti-whalers carry first sessions
- Save-the-Whales (take action NOW!!) -- online petition
- Whalewatch | Sample Letter For World Oceans Day and the Protection of Whales
Aboriginal whaling quotas renewed
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) -- The International Whaling
Commission renewed a five-year whaling quota for indigenous people
in the United States and Russia on Tuesday, allowing Alaska Natives
to continue hunting bowhead whales for subsistence purposes.
By a consensus vote, Alaska Natives and the indigenous people of
Chukotka, Russia, were allocated a shared catch limit of 280 bowhead
whales over a period ending in 2012. The proposal maintained
previous catch limits.
The whaling commission is holding its annual meeting near the icy
coasts where Alaska Natives use whale meat as a staple in their diet
and for cultural practices. The commission's U.S. delegation said
its top priority was to obtain a renewal of their quota.
Japan supported the renewal of aboriginal whaling quotas, but Joji
Morishita, Japan's deputy whaling commissioner, asked for
"consistency" from the organization when it raises a proposal to
allow hunting of minke whales by four of its small coastal
communities.
Japan has said its proposal should fall under the umbrella of
community whaling, because whaling has been part of its culture for
thousands of years.
But Shane Rattenbury, Greenpeace International's head delegate,
called the proposal "another example of commercial whaling in
disguise."
Japan is expected to offer its coastal whaling proposal on
Wednesday. Anti-whaling nations have already voiced opposition to
the proposal.
Sanctuary fuels debate
The diplomatic tone of the meeting turned testy after Brazil and
Argentina proposed the creation of a South Atlantic whale sanctuary
that would extend from the east coast of South America to the west
coast of Africa.
Iceland, which opposes the sanctuary, said the proposal runs
contrary to the commission's conventions. Pro-whaling nations argue
that sanctuaries do not take into account scientific findings about
growing whale stocks.
Brazil has proposed the sanctuary every year since 1998, but it has
failed to get 75 percent of the votes needed to create a zone free
from whaling in the South Atlantic Ocean. The only two sanctuaries
that exist today are in the Indian Ocean and the Antarctic, or
Southern, Ocean.
The debate will continue, and the proposal is expected to come up
for a vote on Wednesday.
Another unresolved matter was a separate proposal by Greenland to
expand its indigenous hunting of minke whales. The Danish territory
also wants to include humpback and bowhead whales into the annual
hunt.
"It is necessary for the needs of the local people of Greenland that
have never been met by the IWC quotas of the last 20 years," said
Amalie Jessen, a delegate from Greenland, told Reuters. "Eating
Westernized food is not healthy."
The proposal, made by Denmark, calls for an increase of western
Greenland's minke-whale catch limits by 25 a year to 200 and the
creation of an annual hunting quota of 10 humpback whales and two
bowhead whales.
Anti-whaling nations said it would support the status quo for
Greenland's catch limits, but said there was not enough scientific
evidence to accept that an increase in catch limits would be
sustainable. The vote was pushed back indefinitely to let Greenland
do more negotiations for its proposal.
Other indigenous communities that maintained the status quo for
catch quotas had their renewals passed by consensus vote.
The commission also renewed Russia's and the United States'
aboriginal catch limits for gray whales in the North Pacific. And
St. Vincent and the Grenadines in the Caribbean also got a five-year
catch quota of four humpback whales a year renewed.
Source: CNN, POSTED: 11:59 p.m. EDT, May 29, 2007
Nations seek end to trawling seas
WASHINGTON (AP) -- More than 20 nations agreed Friday to discourage
unregulated and destructive bottom trawling on the South Pacific high seas,
a victory for environmental groups.
The agreement, which takes effect September 30, is intended to protect about
a quarter of the world's high seas, a vast area extending roughly from the
Equator to the Antarctic Circle and from Australia and New Zealand to the
west coast of South America.
Observers and ship locator monitoring systems are to be used, and vessels
must remain at least five nautical miles (9,260 meters) from deep-water
corals and other vulnerable marine ecosystems.
The agreement reached in Renaca, Chile, follows a U.N. General Assembly
resolution in December aimed at getting tough on high-seas bottom trawling,
which involves fishing boats that drag giant nets along the sea floor.
Enormously effective at catching fish, the nets also wipe out almost
everything in their path, smash coral and stir clouds of sediment that
smother sea life, marine experts say.
Orange roughy is the main commercial fish in the South Pacific high seas,
mainly caught by New Zealand fishing vessels. Estimates of the fishing trade
range up to about $10 million (euro7.4 million).
New Zealand officials agreed to the voluntary restrictions in the South
Pacific high seas, but they said the restrictions could "severely constrain"
its fishing vessels. The ecological costs of the huge nets are far higher,
environmental groups said.
"This area contains thousands of these underwater sea mountains, or
seamounts, that are considered to be some of the most ecologically rich
habitats in the world," said Joshua Reichert, director of the private Pew
Charitable Trusts' environment division, which coordinated the groups'
campaign. "For all of us, this really represents a major step forward for
marine conservation."
A U.N. report last year called bottom trawling a danger to unique and
unexplored ecological systems. It said slightly more than half the
underwater mountain and coral ecosystems in the world can be found beyond
the protection of national boundaries.
The new agreement is among members of the fledgling South Pacific Regional
Fisheries Management Organization: Australia, Canada, Chile, China,
Colombia, Cook Islands, Ecuador, the European Commission, Federated States
of Micronesia, France, Japan, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea,
Peru, Russia, South Korea, Ukraine, the United States and Vanuatu.
Source: CNN, POSTED: 10:31 a.m. EDT, May 5, 2007
Related Information
- Landmark Agreement First of Its Kind to Stop Destruction from High Seas Bottom Trawling
- South Pacific to stop bottom-trawling
- Illegal-Fishing.info
International Coastal Cleanup
International
Coastal Cleanup needs volunteers to help our oceans...
Clean oceans and waterways are vital to our health and safety. The International Coastal Cleanup is the world's largest one-day volunteer effort on behalf of the marine environment. Help us restore health to our oceans and waterways by volunteering in this year's International Coastal Cleanup. Events take place in more than 90 countries and in all 55 U.S. states and territories.
What: The International Coastal Cleanup; The world's
largest one-day volunteer effort to remove marine debris.
When: view website at
www.coastalcleanup.org
for current dates...
Where: At a local beach or waterway near you.
Background: The International Coastal Cleanup is the world's
largest one-day volunteer effort on behalf of the marine
environment. In 2003 more then 450,000 people from all 55 U.S.
states and territories and over 90 countries around the world
participated in the cleanup collecting over 7.55 million pounds of
marine debris. Volunteers also found 237 entangled animals last
year, emphasizing the dangers that marine debris plays in the
coastal environment.
From community groups to families and concerned citizens, many of
your readers are participating in a local cleanup. Help tell their
story and the story of how marine debris is not only an eyesore, but
also poses a serious risk to health and human safety and harms
wildlife.
To find a Cleanup site near you call
1-800-262-BEACH or log onto
www.coastalcleanup.org.
Sea Turtle Conservation Program
Sea Turtles are seriously threatened, many are nearing extinction. Below are a few links to organizations that are making an effort to help save these amazing creatures. Find out how you can become a volunteer by contacting your location environmental group in your area. more...
Save the Albatross Campaign
The problem - Most albatrosses and several other seabird
species are heading for extinction. They are being unintentionally
drowned in large numbers by "longline" fishing boats. Longlining is
the single greatest threat to the world's seabirds. Much of it is
carried out by "pirate" fishing boats.
Save the Albatross |
Albatross Conservation | Donate:
Online ▪
Form
(pdf)
World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSAP)
WSPA
works to raise the standards of animal welfare throughout the globe
and their vision is a world in which the welfare of animals is
understood and respected by everyone, and protected by effective
legislation.
Through their collaborative projects, WSPA is Campaigning Against Cruelty by exposing animal abuse and enforcing stronger laws; their Animal Rescue teams are working to save abandoned or neglected animals or those stricken by disasters; and by Changing Hearts and Minds amongst people living and working with animals, WSPA is forging a safer future for all animals.
- How can I Help
- Say 'NO' to Dolphin Captivity | Dolphin Facts
- Dolphin Protection Campaign Toolkit (pdf)
- Norway Set to Kill More Whales
- Make a Donation
Choose Seafood Wisely
If you’re having trouble keeping track of which species of seafood and shellfish are safe to buy from an ecological perspective, then check out the latest Seafood MiniGuides from the websites listed below. Your seafood choices can really help protect the health of our oceans for future generations. Since many of your favorite kinds of seafood are disappearing from the world's oceans because of over-fishing, habitat destruction and the unintentional catch of other species, being educated about the right seafood to buy at the store or order in restaurants, will make sure our favorite seafood and shellfish will be around for years to come.
In addition to making a difference with your seafood choices, you can take part in local conservation projects as well like beach and river cleanups.
- National Audubon Society's Living Oceans Program
- Environmental Defense "Which Fish is Best?" - Best & Worst Picks
- Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch Program - National Chart
- Marine Stewardship Council
- National Audubon Society Right Bite card in PDF format:
Black and White | Color

Links
Atlantis Marine World
Blue
Ocean Institute -
Seafood Miniguide (pdf)
Endangered Species Act of 1973, US Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered Species Program, US Fish & Wildlife Service
List of Endangered & Threatened Wildlife Species of New York State
Manatee Junction
Monterey Bay
Aquarium
Monterey Bay
Aquarium Research Institute
National Maritime Initiative
National Marine Sanctuary Program
Oceana -
campaigns to protect and restore the world’s oceans
OceanNEnvironment
Okeanos Ocean Research Foundation, Inc.
PaleMale: Red-tailed hawk who manages to
thrive in New York City ( Links:
1
2 3
)
Peregrine
Falcons: Webcam at 55 water street in New York City
SaveTheEnvironment.com
Save the Manatee Club
Sea Turtle Conservation Program
Shark Conservation
The Ocean
Conservancy
Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution
World Wildlife Fund
Zoos and
Aquariums of AZA
Any questions not addressed in the above pages or in this website, should be
forwarded by email to Technical Support.
- http://www.ecophotoexplorers.com/contacts.asp?subject=Technical Support#form



